Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


h1. Example Consider a beam that has pin supports at both of its end. The beam is loaded by a point load in gravity direction applied at the midspan of the beam. The following 2 cases are being considered: * Case 1: The beam is created with default (centroid, 10) insertion point. * Case 2: The beam is created with top-center (8) insertion point. It was observed that there is a larger midspan deflection for case 1 than for case 2. This is caused by different boundary conditions, which are a consequence of using different insertion points. The stiffness of the beam is the same for the two cases. Since you are using pinned support at both ends of the girder, the girder is essentially restrained in longitudinal direction at its both ends. For case 2, the longitudinal restraint is not located at the centroid of the cross-section, but at the top-center (8) insertion point. This restraint prevents the top fibers from shortening and it introduces a tensile longitudinal force acting on an arm about the neutral axis of the section. This eccentric tensile reaction creates negative moment about the centroid of the cross-section, which reduces the positive moment due to the applied loads and thus results in smaller midspan deflection. Reviewing the screenshots below (mainly the moment diagram, axial force diagram and reactions) should make this clear. !Insertion_points_example.png! !Insertion_points_example_-_reactions.png! If you change one support from pin to roller, you would see exactly the same response for the two cases, because no longitudinal forces is being created. You may also find the attached verification Problem 1-011 useful to understand insertion points. This problem is also accessible from "Help > Documentation > Analysis Verification > Frames" menu. {hidden-content} Example originally created by ok for "090306 frame insertion points xxx" support request. {hidden-content}
Wiki Markup
Info

Effect of insertion point on beam reactions presents additional information on this topic.


The insertion point relates the actual position of an object to the line drawn to represent that object in a model. By default, prismatic objects are positioned such that their centroid and analytical properties align with the line shown in the computational model. Curvilinear objects are positioned such that their midspan centroid is in alignment. Sometimes, however, an insertion point is specified such that an object is positioned relative to this line. For example, if a girder should be drawn such that its nodes are at each end of the top flange, the top-center insertion point should be specified before drawing the object. This will position the girder below the line which represents its location.

Insertion-point example

To demonstrate, an example considers a simply supported beam with pin supports at either end. A point load, oriented in the gravity direction, is applied to the beam midspan. The two cases considered for beam location include:

  • Case 1: Default insertion point at the object centroid (object 10)
  • Case 2: Top-center insertion point (object 8)

Upon completion of analysis, it is observed that the midspan deflection for Case 1 is larger than that for Case 2. While beam stiffness is the same for each model, this discrepancy may be attributed to the difference in boundary conditions which results from variable insertion-point location.

The pinned-support configuration restrains each beam against longitudinal displacement. For Case 2, this longitudinal restraint is not at the centroid of the cross-section (10), but at the top-center insertion point (8). This prevents the top fibers from shortening, and introduces a longitudinal tension force which acts on an arm about the neutral axis. Eccentricity creates a negative moment which reduces the positive moment induced by applied loading. This also reduces midspan displacement. Figure 1 displays beam geometry and deflection, and Figure 2 presents moment- and axial-force diagrams.


Image Added

Figure 1 - Beam geometry and deflection


Image Added

Figure 2 - Moment- and axial-force diagrams


The insertion of a roller support at one of the previous pin locations would free the beam from longitudinal response. This is shown in Figure 3:


Image Added

Figure 3 - Longitudinal release from roller support

See Also

  • Verification Problem 1-011, available in Context Help through the Help > Documentation > Analysis Verification > Frames menu


Show if
groupeditors

Related Incidents:

  • Frame insertion points 090306